Advisory Opinion 22

Providing excerpted portions of the testimony (Originally written, 1995; Restated, 2003)

Statement of Facts

A court reporter has requested the Committee on Professional Ethics for an advisory opinion regarding the permissibility under NCRA's Code of Professional Ethics of transcribing excerpted portions of testimony for one party to the proceeding. During a recess, an attorney requests the reporter to transcribe an excerpted portion of the testimony and provide the transcription to the attorney before the proceeding resumes the next day. The other party is unaware of this request. Does the reporter have an obligation to inform the other party that the attorney has requested an excerpted portion of the transcript? Must the reporter make that excerpt or similar excerpts available to the other party?

Discussion

It is the Committee's opinion that the impartiality and independence of the reporter, as mandated by Provision No. 1 of the Code, require a two-step disclosure process by the reporter in this situation. First, the reporter must notify the requesting attorney at the time of the request that the reporter is obligated to disclose to the other party that (1) the reporter has received a request for an excerpt and (2) the other party has the opportunity to request excerpts, including the same excerpts ordered by the requesting attorney. Second, if the requesting attorney still wishes an excerpt, the reporter must then make these required disclosures to the other party. The other party may then request excerpts from the reporter. If specifically requested, the reporter must deliver to the other party copies of the same excerpts provided to the requesting attorney. The Committee believes that this two-step disclosure process preserves the impartiality of the reporter and ensures fairness in the reporting of the proceeding.

This two-step disclosure process applies, but is not limited to, requests for uncertified rough drafts, certified deposition transcripts and excerpted or certified courtroom transcripts.

Conclusion

The Committee on Professional Ethics believes that a reporter requested to transcribe an excerpted portion of testimony for one party to an action before the proceeding resumes the next day, must engage in a two-part disclosure process to preserve the reporter's impartiality. First, the reporter must notify the requesting attorney of the reporter's obligation to inform the other party that the reporter has received a request for an excerpt and that the reporter must offer the other party the opportunity to order excerpts, including the same excerpts r ordered by the requesting attorney. Second, assuming the requesting attorney still wants an excerpt, the reporter must disclose to the other party that a request for an excerpt of the proceeding was made and that such other party has the right to request transcript excerpts that it may require, including those ordered by the requesting attorney. If specifically requested, the reporter must then deliver the excerpts the requesting attorney ordered to the other party. Failure to follow these disclosure practices would place the reporter into a situation that would compromise the reporter's impartiality and violate Provision No. 1 of the Code.

This two-step disclosure process applies, but is not limited to, requests for uncertified rough drafts, certified deposition transcripts and excerpted or certified courtroom transcripts.


THIS PUBLIC ADVISORY OPINION REFLECTS THE STATUS OF THE LAW IN MOST JURISDICTIONS. MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO THE ACCEPTED PRACTICES SET FORTH IN THIS PUBLIC ADVISORY OPINION TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH PRACTICES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THEIR OWN APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS.








Home | Privacy Policy | Site Map

©2010 National Court Reporters Association, All Rights Reserved